Five KYC essentials – Deutsche Bank (2024)

  • Five KYC essentials

March 2018

Katja Zschieschang looks at how KYC challenges have evolved for correspondent banks in recent years, the benefits of a collaborative approach to data collection and the use of APIs in pulling data from a common repository

In the “new normal” of stricter regulatory compliance around Know Your Customer, or KYC, financial institutions are seeking ways to drive operational efficiencies and reduce costs. Many have taken initial steps in exploring KYC utilities – shared repositories of KYC information that all signed-up institutions can access for their individual compliance requirements. This removes some duplication of effort, but does it bring its own challenges? Katja Zschieschang, Deutsche Bank’s resident KYC expert, answers five of the most pressing questions.

How have KYC challenges evolved for correspondent banks in recent years?

Katja: Knowing the customer has always been at the heart of banking business, but regulatory changes have increased correspondent banks’ due diligence obligations significantly over the past decade. At its core, this means banks must take the necessary steps, both in terms of compliance frameworks and related processes, to understand the risks inherent in the payment flows of not only their own clients, but also their clients’ clients. This is a challenge in its own right, but made more difficult by the vast data collection requirements that it inevitably brings.

As well as anti-money laundering (AML) rules, we must also comply with multiple sanctions regimes and fraud prevention requirements. The increased data collection workload is perhaps best reflected in the fact that the new due diligence questionnaire from The Wolfsberg Group – an association of 13 global banks which aims to develop frameworks for the management of financial crime risk – stretches to more than 20 pages. This industry initiative has been welcomed by global regulators such as the The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB).

How are correspondent banks adjusting their processes to handle KYC challenges?

Katja: We embedded SWIFT’s KYC Registry into our KYC process for financial institutions very early on, back in 2015, which helps us to check the business case and risk assessments involved with managing our correspondent banking network. Due to the larger volume of data we must now collect, we, like other correspondent banks, have to be much more efficient in our data processes, both internally and externally. As such, having a central repository with frequently updated customer information is a welcome aid to the KYC process.

Internally, we are improving how we share and utilise data across business units in order to remove duplicate checks over the same core pieces of information. Like many banks, we initially bolstered our head count to cope with the increased demand for data capture and evaluation brought by more stringent regulatory obligations, but we’re now getting smarter in how we review information. Rather than several different departments sourcing the same or similar information, we take a more holistic approach whereby we share the same core information then request more specialist product-specific information if necessary.

For many correspondent banks, the natural consequence of heightened KYC obligations, and the associated costs, has been strategic de-risking. It is inevitable that banks will evaluate the commercial value of a relationship against the cost of maintaining it – leading to some withdrawal from selected relationships and markets.

How can utilities support KYC efforts?

Katja: Receiving information from banks in different formats can very quickly become problematic in an environment where we have lots of correspondent relationships and a vast flow of information. It can be a significant operational challenge if we all ask slightly different questions of our counterparty banks or if they answer those questions using slightly different definitions. With a utility such as SWIFT’s KYC Registry, the questions and terminology can be standardised so that all participants develop a common understanding.

Such utilities also bring benefits for our financial institution clients. Those that make their data available to us via the KYC Registry benefit from a smoother and streamlined review as part of the regular KYC process the bank has to undertake.

How have you and other users worked with SWIFT to ensure the KYC Registry meets the evolving needs of correspondent banks?

Katja: The KYC Registry was developed in collaboration with major global banks – with Deutsche Bank being a part of the 15-member working group, set up by SWIFT to understand the needs of users, since June 2015. This collaborative approach has yielded significant benefits – we have identified the need for timestamps on documents, for example. The next priority is to explore the use of APIs to pull data from the KYC Registry directly into our internal systems, although this may be a longer-term project.

We’re keen for as many of our correspondent banks to use the KYC Registry as possible, but there has been some resistance from smaller banks on account of upfront costs. However, it is hoped that ongoing efforts to explain the security and standardisation benefits of sharing data via a dedicated utility – rather than bilaterally over email – will overcome these reservations.

What is the regulatory view of utilities, and what further regulatory challenges are on the horizon?

Katja: Regulators require us to conduct AML assessments on entities we deal with. As such, the KYC Registry, or any other third party utility, is regarded as a structured and useful source of information which can complement our own assessments.

AML compliance will continue to be a big focus this year, especially given the incoming requirements brought by the Fourth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive. Given how sweeping the regulation is, all market participants will be highly focused on meeting its requirements – and we will be engaging frequently with our financial institution clients and other banks in the market.

Five KYC essentials – Deutsche Bank (1)

Katja Zschieschang

KYC Business Execution | Business Control Unit | Corporate Bank | Deutsche Bank

Stay up-to-date with

Sign-up flow newsbites

Choose your preferred banking topics and we will send you updated emails based on your selection

Sign-up Sign-up

Subscribe Subscribe to our magazine

flow magazine is published twice per year and can be read online and delivered to your door in print

Subscribe Subscribe

MACRO AND MARKETS, TECHNOLOGY

Moving out of Covid-19 Moving out of Covid-19

The global Covid-19 crisis response during transition from lockdown to gradual reopening is at a critical juncture. Clarissa Dann summarises recent Deutsche Bank research and analysis

Moving out of Covid-19 More

TECHNOLOGY, REGULATION, CASH MANAGEMENT {icon-book}

Banking on platforms Banking on platforms

Over the past decade, emerging technology, changing client behaviour and market demand have seen banks put open APIs and cloud technology at the heart of their overall business strategies. But is regulation holding back or driving innovation in this space? Polina Evstifeeva investigates

Banking on platforms More

REGULATION {icon-book}

The next big bang? The next big bang?

The ongoing T2/T2S consolidation programme promises a ‘big bang’ moment for the industry

The next big bang? More

As a seasoned expert in the field of Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance and financial regulations, my extensive experience and in-depth knowledge position me to shed light on the essential concepts discussed in the article "Five KYC Essentials" by Katja Zschieschang. Having immersed myself in the intricacies of KYC challenges, collaborative data collection, and the use of APIs, I aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the key points outlined in the article.

  1. Evolution of KYC Challenges for Correspondent Banks: Katja highlights the historical significance of KYC in banking and how regulatory changes have significantly increased due diligence obligations for correspondent banks over the past decade. The core challenge lies in understanding and mitigating risks not only for their own clients but also for their clients' clients. The proliferation of data collection requirements, including anti-money laundering (AML) rules, sanctions regimes, and fraud prevention, has added complexity to the KYC process.

  2. Adjustments in Processes for KYC Challenges: Correspondent banks, including Deutsche Bank, are adapting their processes to efficiently handle the increased volume of data collection. Integration of SWIFT's KYC Registry since 2015 has enabled banks to check business cases and risk assessments related to correspondent banking networks. To cope with the demand, banks are optimizing internal data processes, sharing core information across business units, and strategically de-risking relationships and markets.

  3. Role of Utilities in KYC Efforts: KYC utilities, such as SWIFT's KYC Registry, offer a centralized repository with standardized questions and terminology. This standardization facilitates a common understanding among participants, streamlining the KYC process. The use of such utilities not only benefits correspondent banks but also provides advantages for financial institution clients by ensuring a smoother and more streamlined review.

  4. Collaboration with SWIFT for KYC Registry Enhancement: The article emphasizes the collaborative development of the KYC Registry with major global banks, including Deutsche Bank, as part of a 15-member working group established by SWIFT since June 2015. The collaboration has identified enhancements such as the need for timestamps on documents, with future priorities focusing on exploring the use of APIs to directly pull data into internal systems.

  5. Regulatory View of Utilities and Future Challenges: Regulators acknowledge the importance of KYC utilities as structured and useful sources of information that complement banks' AML assessments. The Fourth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive is expected to bring new challenges, and the article emphasizes ongoing engagement with financial institution clients and other banks to ensure compliance.

In conclusion, the evolution of KYC challenges, the strategic adjustments made by correspondent banks, the role of utilities in streamlining processes, collaborative efforts with SWIFT, and ongoing regulatory considerations are crucial aspects covered in the article. As a recognized expert in the field, I can attest to the significance of these concepts in shaping the landscape of KYC compliance for financial institutions.

Five KYC essentials – Deutsche Bank (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Last Updated:

Views: 6307

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Birthday: 2001-01-17

Address: Suite 769 2454 Marsha Coves, Debbieton, MS 95002

Phone: +813077629322

Job: Real-Estate Executive

Hobby: Archery, Metal detecting, Kitesurfing, Genealogy, Kitesurfing, Calligraphy, Roller skating

Introduction: My name is Gov. Deandrea McKenzie, I am a spotless, clean, glamorous, sparkling, adventurous, nice, brainy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.